<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DeathAndTaxes.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com</link>
	<description>News and commentary on sovereigns, tax defiers, and other right wing extremists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:00:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a Sovereign Citizen? by Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=22#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=22#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Honestly this all seems kind of made up. It sounds like you are tying several completely unrelated incidents together and calling it some kind of movement. I don&#039;t believe that this supposed Sovereign Citizens movement really exists. Just a few separate whackos. Unless there is a whacko central website, or they start coordinating planned attacks, it seems to me that this is a waste of homeland security resources. What about gangs? What about the mexican border? I&#039;m absolutely not opposed to law enforcement being prepared to defend themselves but the incidents of these Anarchists committing violent crimes seems to warrant little more than a memo in the grand scheme of things, considering all of the real issues that police have to deal with every day. Maybe you&#039;re getting a little too into conspiracy theories. I mean you said yourself theres no leader, no organization... The same can&#039;t be said of the cartels and the real terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly this all seems kind of made up. It sounds like you are tying several completely unrelated incidents together and calling it some kind of movement. I don&#8217;t believe that this supposed Sovereign Citizens movement really exists. Just a few separate whackos. Unless there is a whacko central website, or they start coordinating planned attacks, it seems to me that this is a waste of homeland security resources. What about gangs? What about the mexican border? I&#8217;m absolutely not opposed to law enforcement being prepared to defend themselves but the incidents of these Anarchists committing violent crimes seems to warrant little more than a memo in the grand scheme of things, considering all of the real issues that police have to deal with every day. Maybe you&#8217;re getting a little too into conspiracy theories. I mean you said yourself theres no leader, no organization&#8230; The same can&#8217;t be said of the cartels and the real terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a Sovereign Citizen? by Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=22#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=22#comment-781</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, you got it very much backward. &quot;The short answer:  a sovereign citizen is someone who believes that he or she is above all laws.&quot;

A sovereign citizen is one who believes that the state is *NOT* above the law. 

You are, unfortunately, part of the problem. The movement is growing because it is about truth and justice. The &quot;potential violent&quot; nature of this &quot;movement&quot; is because criminals often see this as something they like because at first glance it can look like you can break laws with impunity. Nothing if further from the truth, however, criminals abuse everything else, why wouldn&#039;t they abuse this. 

Your article, though well written, has holes that 747s are flying through with the landing gear down. You might want to study some stuff before writing next time. Black&#039;s Law Dictionary might be a first stop. I would recommend finding out the difference between a &quot;person&quot; and a &quot;natural person&quot; and move on from there. I do, however, suspect that you really don&#039;t care. You have your opinions, the facts be damned. Its good to be determined, but, what if your determination is wrong according to 1000 years of basic law principals that have been washed from modern society? 

I really don&#039;t expect you to recant. That would be requesting far too much. You make your living writing this stuff, why would you change. For the truth? I doubt it. Keep writing your stuff. Someday you may wish you had looked it all up in Blacks Law Dictionary before you came down on the side of tyranny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, you got it very much backward. &#8220;The short answer:  a sovereign citizen is someone who believes that he or she is above all laws.&#8221;</p>
<p>A sovereign citizen is one who believes that the state is *NOT* above the law. </p>
<p>You are, unfortunately, part of the problem. The movement is growing because it is about truth and justice. The &#8220;potential violent&#8221; nature of this &#8220;movement&#8221; is because criminals often see this as something they like because at first glance it can look like you can break laws with impunity. Nothing if further from the truth, however, criminals abuse everything else, why wouldn&#8217;t they abuse this. </p>
<p>Your article, though well written, has holes that 747s are flying through with the landing gear down. You might want to study some stuff before writing next time. Black&#8217;s Law Dictionary might be a first stop. I would recommend finding out the difference between a &#8220;person&#8221; and a &#8220;natural person&#8221; and move on from there. I do, however, suspect that you really don&#8217;t care. You have your opinions, the facts be damned. Its good to be determined, but, what if your determination is wrong according to 1000 years of basic law principals that have been washed from modern society? </p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t expect you to recant. That would be requesting far too much. You make your living writing this stuff, why would you change. For the truth? I doubt it. Keep writing your stuff. Someday you may wish you had looked it all up in Blacks Law Dictionary before you came down on the side of tyranny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About JJ MacNab by Peter Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?page_id=2#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?page_id=2#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Nice to see you on forbes.com.  I follow tax protesters but not with your focus.  Funny that I posted something about Ron Paul and the Browns and then saw your piece.

I noticed in August that this stuff is starting to go local

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2011/08/17/yo-patriots-your-bs-doesnt-work-for-property-taxes-either/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see you on forbes.com.  I follow tax protesters but not with your focus.  Funny that I posted something about Ron Paul and the Browns and then saw your piece.</p>
<p>I noticed in August that this stuff is starting to go local</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2011/08/17/yo-patriots-your-bs-doesnt-work-for-property-taxes-either/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2011/08/17/yo-patriots-your-bs-doesnt-work-for-property-taxes-either/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent examples of right wing violence by Don't Discount Dangerous Extremists Just Because They're 55 Plus - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=13#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Discount Dangerous Extremists Just Because They're 55 Plus - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=13#comment-126</guid>
		<description>[...] terrorism more seriously because anger in the right wing extremist movement is currently reaching white-hot levels. Last week, four right wing extremists were arrested for plotting to kill government employees, law [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] terrorism more seriously because anger in the right wing extremist movement is currently reaching white-hot levels. Last week, four right wing extremists were arrested for plotting to kill government employees, law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Politics of Domestic Terrorism by Don't Discount Dangerous Extremists Just Because They're 55 Plus - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=11#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Discount Dangerous Extremists Just Because They're 55 Plus - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?p=11#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] weeks ago, I posted an article on the need for the federal government to take non-Islamic domestic terrorism more seriou... because anger in the right wing extremist movement is currently reaching white-hot levels. Last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weeks ago, I posted an article on the need for the federal government to take non-Islamic domestic terrorism more seriou&#8230; because anger in the right wing extremist movement is currently reaching white-hot levels. Last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About JJ MacNab by Don't Discount Dangerous Extremists Just Because They're 55 Plus - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?page_id=2#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Discount Dangerous Extremists Just Because They're 55 Plus - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deathandtaxes.com/?page_id=2#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] news broke last week of the arrest of four Georgia right wing extremists, I wondered what  JJ MacNab would make of it.  I first met MacNab in the 1990s, when both she and I were investigating charity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news broke last week of the arrest of four Georgia right wing extremists, I wondered what  JJ MacNab would make of it.  I first met MacNab in the 1990s, when both she and I were investigating charity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

